www-rdf-interest@w3.org from October 2004 by date

Friday, 29 October 2004

• Re: Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? charles@w3.org
• Re: Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? Jan Algermissen
• Re: W3C is developing SPARQL Re: RDF Path? Jan Algermissen
• [ANNOUNCE] More Nature RSS Newsfeeds Hammond, Tony
• W3C is developing SPARQL Re: RDF Path? charles@w3.org
• Re: Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? Graham Klyne
• RDF Path? Jan Algermissen
• Re: Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? Jan Algermissen
• Re: Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? Jan Algermissen
• Re: Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? Chris Purcell
• Re: Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? Jan Algermissen
• Re: Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? Benja Fallenstein
• Re: Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? charles@w3.org

Thursday, 28 October 2004

• Re: RDF vocabulary for integrity constraints? Kendall Clark
• RDF vocabulary for integrity constraints? Jan Algermissen
• Ways to restrict the properties a class may have? Jan Algermissen
• RE: RDF in MS .Net Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 27 October 2004

• Re: [rdfweb-dev] Re: licence for Ontologies Henry Story
• Re: licence for Ontologies Henry Story
• Re: licence for Ontologies Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Smart Literal proposal charles@w3.org
• Re: licence for Ontologies Henry Story

Tuesday, 26 October 2004

• RE: Smart Literal proposal Stephane Fellah
• RE: Smart Literal proposal Graham Klyne
• Semantic Desktop integration discussion. Leo Sauermann

Monday, 25 October 2004

• ANNOUNCEMENT: Rasqal RDF Query Library 0.9.3 Dave Beckett
• RE: Smart Literal proposal Stephane Fellah
• Re: [announcement] SIMILE Longwell 1.0 Released Ryan Lee

Sunday, 24 October 2004

• Re: Smart Literal proposal charles@w3.org
• Re: Smart Literal proposal Graham Klyne

Monday, 25 October 2004

• Re: [announcement] SIMILE Longwell 1.0 Released Arjohn Kampman

Sunday, 24 October 2004

• ANNOUNCEMENT: Raptor RDF Parser Toolkit 1.4.0 Dave Beckett

Saturday, 23 October 2004

• Re: Smart Literal proposal Graham Klyne
• Re: [announcement] SIMILE Longwell 1.0 Released jos.deroo@agfa.com
• [announcement] SIMILE Longwell 1.0 Released Stefano Mazzocchi

Friday, 22 October 2004

• Smart Literal proposal Stephane Fellah
• ANN: RAP - RDF API for PHP V0.9 released - including RDFS inference support and a Jena-like resouce-centric API Chris Bizer

Thursday, 21 October 2004

• Re: RDF of airline flight schedule available Jim Ley
• RDF of airline flight schedule available DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Chris Purcell

Wednesday, 20 October 2004

• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Phil Dawes

Thursday, 21 October 2004

• ICEIS'2005: Workshop on Ubiquitous Computing IWUC'2005 KOUADRI MOSTEFAOUI Soraya
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Daniel Krech
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Daniel Krech
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Daniel Krech
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Chris Purcell

Wednesday, 20 October 2004

• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Adam Souzis
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Phil Dawes
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Phil Dawes
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Chris Purcell
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Phil Dawes
• Re: RDF in MS .Net Josh Sled
• RE: RDF in MS .Net diego gonzalez
• Re: RDF in MS .Net Ian Davis
• RDF in MS .Net Kianoush Eshaghi
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Kendall Clark
• IsaViz 2.1 released Emmanuel Pietriga
• Re: N-Triples Parser for Python Ivan Herman
• Re: a doubt on basic concepts Jeen Broekstra
• Re: a doubt on basic concepts Peter
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Tuesday, 19 October 2004

• ANN: Semantic Planet RDF Library and Carp RDF Processor Ian Davis
• N-Triples Parser for Python Sean B. Palmer
• Re: a doubt on basic concepts Jeen Broekstra
• Re: [media_and_entertainment] VOD streaming without webpage Stephen Rhoads
• Re: a doubt on basic concepts Jeen Broekstra
• Re: Troublesome relations Benja Fallenstein
• Device independents and RDF Lisa Seeman
• a doubt on basic concepts Peter
• Re: RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL Stefano Mazzocchi
• Re: Troublesome relations Thomas B. Passin
• RE: Revised draft of CBD John Black
• Re: Troublesome relations Adrian Walker
• Re: Troublesome relations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Troublesome relations Danny Ayers
• Re: Troublesome relations Thomas B. Passin
• Re: Troublesome relations Thomas B. Passin
• RE: Revised draft of CBD John Black
• RE: RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Troublesome relations Adrian Walker
• Re: Troublesome relations Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
• Troublesome relations Danny Ayers
• CFP update: 3rd Int'l Conf. on Active Media Technology H. TARUMI
• rdf:Statement Kianoush Eshaghi
• Re: Revised draft of CBD Peter
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Monday, 18 October 2004

• RE: Revised draft of CBD John Black
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Revised draft of CBD John Black
• RE: Web services returning RDF? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Web services returning RDF? Benja Fallenstein
• FOIS-2004: LAST CALL FOR PARTICIPATION Jos Lehmann
• RE: Web services returning RDF? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: with WSDL Re: Web services returning RDF? Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 17 October 2004

• Pls clarify my question Chaitanya Saragadam

Saturday, 16 October 2004

• Re: Web services returning RDF? Ian Dickinson
• Re: Web services returning RDF? Ian Dickinson
• Re: Some fuzzy with cardinality restriction vs complex property in OWL Ivan Herman
• Re: Some fuzzy with cardinality restriction vs complex property in OWL Yuzhong Qu
• Re: Some fuzzy with cardinality restriction vs complex property in OWL Ivan Herman

Friday, 15 October 2004

• Re: RDF Model Theory ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: RDF Model Theory Graham Klyne
• RDF Model Theory Marcelo Custódio
• ANNOUNCE: Rx4RDF and Rhizome 0.4.1 Adam Souzis

Thursday, 14 October 2004

• With WSDL Re: Web services returning RDF? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: RDF tools and Accepts headers. A survey. Dave Beckett
• Re: with WSDL Re: Web services returning RDF? NJ Rogers, Learning and Research Technology
• RDF tools and Accepts headers. A survey. Jon Hanna
• RE: Web services returning RDF? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• URIQA and value added functionality Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• with WSDL Re: Web services returning RDF? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Web services returning RDF? Benja Fallenstein

Wednesday, 13 October 2004

• Re: Web services returning RDF? Ian Dickinson
• Re: Web services returning RDF? Morten Frederiksen
• Re: URIQA thwarted by WebDAV properties? Emmanouil Batsis
• RE: Web services returning RDF? Geoff Chappell
• Re: Web services returning RDF? Benja Fallenstein
• Web services returning RDF? DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
• RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Atom and RDF Danny Ayers
• Some fuzzy with cardinality restriction vs complex property in OWL Yuzhong Qu
• Re: URIQA thwarted by WebDAV properties? Eric Hanson

Tuesday, 12 October 2004

• Re: intra-document rdf:resource references? Damian Steer
• RE: intra-document rdf:resource references? DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
• Re: intra-document rdf:resource references? Damian Steer
• intra-document rdf:resource references? DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
• Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF Lucas Gonze
• Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF Bill Kearney
• RE: [rdfweb-dev] Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF Jon Hanna
• Re: Atom and RDF Richard Newman
• Re: Atom and RDF Danny Ayers
• RE: [rdfweb-dev] RE: Atom and RDF Joshua Allen
• Re: RDF within Schema / Modeling via Rules Adrian Walker
• Re: Atom and RDF Danny Ayers
• Re: Atom and RDF Robert Sayre
• RE: URIQA thwarted by WebDAV properties? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Karsten Otto
• URIQA thwarted by WebDAV properties? Eric Hanson
• Re: [rdfweb-dev] RE: Atom and RDF Ian Davis
• RE: [RSS-DEV] Re: Atom and RDF Hammond, Tony
• RE: URIQA thwarted by context problems? (NOT) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Atom and RDF Danny Ayers
• RE: OWL AS --> XML/RDF? Peter Crowther
• Re: Atom and RDF Danny Ayers
• RDF within Schema Craig Gannon
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Atom and RDF Joshua Allen
• RE: Atom and RDF Jon Hanna
• RE: Atom and RDF Joshua Allen
• .NET semweb demos? charles@w3.org

Monday, 11 October 2004

• Re: Atom and RDF Danny Ayers
• Re: OWL AS --> XML/RDF? Anupriya Ankolekar
• Re: OWL AS --> XML/RDF? Richard Newman
• Re: OWL AS --> XML/RDF? Stephen Rhoads
• RE: Atom and RDF Joshua Allen
• RE: Atom and RDF Jon Hanna
• Graph matching Charlie Abela
• Re: Atom and RDF Richard Newman
• CfP: ESWC2005 - 2nd European Semantic Web Conference York Sure
• Re: RDF Graph Jan Algermissen
• Re: Atom and RDF Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
• Re: RDF Graph Frank Manola
• RE: Atom and RDF Jon Hanna
• Re: Atom and RDF Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Graph Graham Klyne
• Re: URIQA thwarted by context problems? (NOT) Richard Newman
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Karsten Otto
• Re: Revised draft of CBD Thomas B. Passin
• RE: URIQA thwarted by context problems? (NOT) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: URIQA thwarted by context problems? (NOT) Richard Newman
• RE: URIQA thwarted by context problems? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: URIQA thwarted by context problems? Phil Tetlow
• RE: URIQA thwarted by context problems? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: URIQA thwarted by context problems? (NOT) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: URIQA thwarted by context problems? Phil Dawes
• RE: URIQA thwarted by context problems? (NOT) Phil Dawes
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Sunday, 10 October 2004

• Re: Revised draft of CBD Thomas B. Passin
• Re: mapping FOL -> DL Enrico Franconi
• Atom and RDF Danny Ayers
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Best way to assert that "s p o" was true at time t? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: URIQA thwarted by context problems? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: URIQA thwarted by context problems? (NOT) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Best way to assert that "s p o" was true at time t? Thomas B. Passin
• Re: URIQA thwarted by context problems? Giovanni Tummarello

Saturday, 9 October 2004

• RE: Best way to assert that "s p o" was true at time t? Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 10 October 2004

• Re: URIQA thwarted by context problems? Adrian Walker

Saturday, 9 October 2004

• First PhotoBingo game will be held from October 14th to 24th Timothy Falconer

Friday, 8 October 2004

• URIQA thwarted by context problems? Phil Dawes

Saturday, 9 October 2004

• RE: Best way to assert that "s p o" was true at time t? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Best way to assert that "s p o" was true at time t? Jeffrey Yasskin
• RE: Some thoughts on effective access to "primary" vs "secondary" resources, consistency of descriptions, and bootstrapping the semantic web... Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Some thoughts on effective access to "primary" vs "secondary" resources, consistency of descriptions, and bootstrapping the semantic web... Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Best way to assert that "s p o" was true at time t? Jeffrey Yasskin
• Re: Duplicate triples Re: RDF Graph Paul Gearon
• Re: Duplicate triples Re: RDF Graph Paul Gearon
• Re: Versioning Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 8 October 2004

• Versioning Eric Jain
• RE: Some thoughts on effective access to "primary" vs "secondary" resources, consistency of descriptions, and bootstrapping the semantic w eb... Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• Some thoughts on effective access to "primary" vs "secondary" resources, consistency of descriptions, and bootstrapping the semantic web... Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Call for Participation: OTM 2004 Laura Bright

Thursday, 7 October 2004

• OWL AS --> XML/RDF? Stephen Rhoads
• RE: Is this the Semantic Web? DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)
• RE: Novel HTTP methods and the standard Sun Java SDK (was RE: Revised draft of CBD) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) John Black
• Re: Novel HTTP methods and the standard Sun Java SDK (was RE: Revised draft of CBD) Stefano Mazzocchi
• Re: Revised draft of CBD Karsten Otto
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Novel HTTP methods and the standard Sun Java SDK (was RE: Revised draft of CBD) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Wednesday, 6 October 2004

• Fwd: Re: Duplicate triples Re: RDF Graph Emmanouil Batsis
• Re: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Richard Newman
• Duplicate triples Re: RDF Graph Charles McCathieNevile
• BPM 2005: Call for Workshop Proposals (New submission deadline) Chris Bussler
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Stephen Rhoads
• Re: Revised draft of CBD Stefano Mazzocchi
• Ann: SWI-Prolog SeRQL engine 0.3.1 Jan Wielemaker
• [ANN] Kowari 1.0.5 released Tom Adams
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Sandro Hawke
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Sandro Hawke
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Hammond, Tony
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema (run away... run away... ;-) Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Tuesday, 5 October 2004

• RDF Graph Jan Algermissen
• Re: Is this the Semantic Web? Thomas B. Passin
• Re: Is this the Semantic Web? Dan Brickley
• Re: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema Leo Sauermann
• Re: Revised draft of CBD Leo Sauermann
• Re: Revised draft of CBD Giovanni Tummarello
• Revised draft of CBD Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Is this the Semantic Web? Richard Newman
• Re: RDF friendly XML Graham Klyne
• Is this the Semantic Web? Graham Klyne
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema Hammond, Tony
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema Michael Steidl/MDir IPTC
• Re: RDF friendly XML Thomas B. Passin
• E-mailbox term in FOAF Etan Wexler

Monday, 4 October 2004

• RDF friendly XML Jan Algermissen
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema Graham Klyne
• RE: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema Hammond, Tony
• Re: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema Graham Klyne
• URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema Michael Steidl/MDir IPTC
• RE: contribution and CBD api? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: contribution and CBD api? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• 2nd Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases Job Daniels
• CFP: W3C Workshop on Metadata for Content Adaptation Job Daniels

Sunday, 3 October 2004

• contribution and CBD api? Giovanni Tummarello
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Friday, 1 October 2004

• Properties and incremental meaning Dom Vonarburg
• Announcing Protege Short Course Samson Tu
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Trent Shipley
• RE: web proper names Uche Ogbuji
• pointer: MSGs as alternative (extended) CBR Giovanni Tummarello
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: web proper names ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Benja Fallenstein
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions John Black
• Re: Creating XML from RDF triples? Jan Algermissen
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Dan Brickley
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Dan Brickley
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: web proper names Phil Dawes
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RE: problems with concise bounded descriptions Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: problems with concise bounded descriptions Eric Prud'hommeaux

Last message date: Friday, 29 October 2004 17:29:13 UTC