- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:07:59 +0100
- To: "paul.downey@bt.com" <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Cc: tpassin@comcast.net, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:59:38 -0000, paul.downey@bt.com <paul.downey@bt.com> wrote: > Hmm .. i guess this is basically a relational 'join' table > where the URIs become the unique key pairs. i'll have a crack > at that approach, thx Tom! Don't forget the open world assumption though - given: "Joe Bloggs represented BT on the FooSpec but took the yankee dollar and worked for Microsoft on the BarSpec." you could end up with: Joe Bloggs worksFor BT AND Joe Bloggs worksFor MS Which could be not only RDF-possible but also (potentially) real-world possible, though not reflect the actual situation. Cheap way around it might be to have a property, workedForButNoMore, so that your end application could discount all corresponding ex-jobs. Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 19:08:00 UTC