- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:49:11 -0500
- To: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
* DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com> [2004-11-29 11:32-0500] > In my search for RDF files, I've been finding a lot of things like this[1]. > A View Source shows that they're HTML, typically with a giant pre element > listing files in them. Is the use of the .rdf file extension for these some > convention unrelated to Resource Description Framework, like the use of the > same extension on ReDIF[2] files? Yep, the ReDIF guys have an attribute/value metadata format in the IAFA Templates tradition, and have been using .rdf as a suffix for some time. Dan > thanks, > > Bob DuCharme www.snee.com/bob <http://www.snee.com/bob> <bob@ > snee.com> weblog on linking-related topics: > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/1191 > <http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/1191> > > [1] > http://cvs2.oeone.com/index.cgi/penzilla3/apps/appliancemanagement/content/c > ontents.rdf > <http://cvs2.oeone.com/index.cgi/penzilla3/apps/appliancemanagement/content/ > contents.rdf> > [2] http://ideas.repec.org/p/rpc/rdfdoc/redif.html > <http://ideas.repec.org/p/rpc/rdfdoc/redif.html>
Received on Monday, 29 November 2004 16:49:11 UTC