- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:30:46 -0000
- To:
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi Benjamin, > > > > http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/water#concept > > http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/ice#concept > >or > > http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/water#Water > > http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/ice#Ice > > Yeah, this style of URI is no good for RDF/OWL Classes or predicates, as it precludes nice looking qnames (such as 'skos:prefLabel'). However, this isn't usually a major concern for RDF descriptions of concepts from thesauri, as these are generally not used as classes or predicates. > I actually like #-vocabs very much as they are usually using the > rdf:ID construct which makes them easier to read (and yes, > "view-source"- > friendliness *can* help the SemWeb grow ;). Couldn't you just use rdf:about with relative URIs and an xml:base? Gives you same reader-friendliness as rdf:ID, and doesn't restrict you to a hash namespace. > could be a nice solution both camps could be > happy with, though. (provided that tools supported such a > feature. It is a nice compromise, but the qname restriction is going to kill it I think for most RDF vocabularies. Al. > I'll > have a thought or two on that..) > > regards, > benjamin > > -- > Benjamin Nowack > > Kruppstr. 100 > 45145 Essen, Germany > http://www.bnode.org/ > > >Al. > > > > > >> > >> >If this has been discussed to death before, please feel free > >> to tell me > >> >so and/or provide a pointer to such a discussion. > >> one related thread ("pound sign vs. slash as final URI delimiter") > >> starts at [1] > >> > >> [1] > >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2004Feb/0117.html >> >> regards, >> benjamin >> >> -- >> Benjamin Nowack >> >> Kruppstr. 100 >> 45145 Essen, Germany >> http://www.bnode.org/ >> >> @ DERI Galway from 2004-10-01 to 2004-12-02 >> http://www.deri.ie/ >> >> >> >> > >> >Cheers, >> > >> >Jeen
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 18:31:21 UTC