- From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:49:03 +0000
- To: Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Arjohn, Thanks for the pointer. Here are my thoughts. "based on just-patented emergent-semantics principles" Great, that's what we need to solve interoperability --- a patented approach. Also, it would appear from the methodology (essentially, exploiting usage to attach some semantics) that the annotation is quite broad. An example is their "genre" annotation, where a cloud of music-sharing agents, through large numbers of exchanges, accrete a concept of genre. Who knows how this (a) maps to human concepts ("postmodern rainbow funk") or (b) generalises and scales (categories for literature or poetry?). I've also seen work previously on evolving a lexicon for interacting agents --- it's attaching the meaning to the real world that's the problem. For that, you always need people. "a top-down approach, such as the Semantic Web" ... riiight. I never knew that we had to get our ontologies checked and agreed by the W3C! As always, nice idea, Sony, but solving the wrong problem and patenting it. IMO, of course! -R On Nov 5, 2004, at 09:23, Arjohn Kampman wrote: > > Someone just notified me of the following article on EE Times: > > http://www.eetimes.com/article/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=51201131 > > "As the World Wide Web Consortium hammers out specifications on how to > recode the databases of the world so that natural-language queries can > be intelligently answered online, Sony Corp. says it has found a better > way." > > Don't know what to think of this article. Is it for real? Comments, > anyone? > > Arjohn > > -- > arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz > Aduna BV - http://aduna.biz/ > Prinses Julianaplein 14-b, 3817 CS Amersfoort, The Netherlands > tel. +31-(0)33-4659987 fax. +31-(0)33-4659987 >
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 09:49:50 UTC