Re: Incompatibilities in RDQL implementations

Seaborne, Andy wrote:
[...]
> My current test suite covers old and new syntactic forms for backwards
> compatibility:
> http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/rdql-tests-jena-2.1a.zip
> 
> Check http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/07/query/ as later versions appear.

Hi Andy, others,

Is the RDQL grammar at [1] up-to-date? If not, could you consider
updating it? Also, could you consider defining the terminals like
<SUCHTHAT>, <STR_MATCH> and <STRING_LITERAL1> in the grammar for the
sake of making it complete and to prevent deviations in implementations?
Currently, one has be dive into the code to find out the definition of
the terminals.

Thanks,

Arjohn

[1] http://jena.sourceforge.net/RDQL/rdql_grammar.html

-- 
arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz
Aduna BV - http://aduna.biz/
Prinses Julianaplein 14-b, 3817 CS Amersfoort, The Netherlands
tel. +31-(0)33-4659987  fax. +31-(0)33-4659987

Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 09:29:06 UTC