Re: less-restrictive range and domain terms from Jeremy Carroll on 2004-05-05 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from May 2004)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 08:13:16 +0100
To: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
Cc: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Message-ID: <4098940C.2050100@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

Benjamin Nowack wrote:

>    <rdf:Property rdf:about="&foaf;knows">
>       <rdfs:range>
>          <owl:Class>
>             <owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">

>                   <!- can a collection have a single item? -->
Yes - even zero items is legal.

>                <owl:Class rdf:about="&rdfs;Resource"/>
>             </owl:unionOf>
>          </owl:Class>
>       </rdfs:range>
>    </rdf:Property>
>

Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 03:13:41 UTC