- From: Stephen Rhoads <rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:57:51 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Over @ Protege-OWL Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> Wrote: > Great thanks. That nearly works correctly. It highlights a bug > in Protégé: the content negotiation for these metadata files is > not done correctly. The namespace required for foaf is > http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ If you request that page from a > normal html web browser it will return a human readable html > description of the foaf classes. If your client requests the > mime type for rdf files, it will return the OWL ontology itself > in rdf format. Did I miss something? When did folks start implementing this? --- Stephen
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 16:57:53 UTC