- From: Mithun Sheshagiri <mits1@umbc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:40:28 -0700
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hello all, I had question about the use of anonymous subClassOf construct in OWL-lite. As per document <http://www.w3c.org/TR/owl-features/> ".....in OWL Lite classes can only be defined in terms of named superclasses (superclasses cannot be arbitrary expressions)...." Does this mean that I cannot classify the following fragment as OWL lite <owl:Class rdf:ID="a"> <owl:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="foo"/> <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="bar"/> </owl:Restriction> </owl:subClassOf> </owl:Class> But if I parse this using Jena and convert into a triple format, a class name is generated for the anonymous superclass. Would this be OWL lite now? Regards, Mithun Sheshagiri
Received on Friday, 18 June 2004 14:41:27 UTC