- From: Mithun Sheshagiri <mits1@umbc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:40:28 -0700
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hello all,
I had question about the use of anonymous subClassOf
construct in OWL-lite. As per document <http://www.w3c.org/TR/owl-features/>
".....in OWL Lite classes can only be defined in terms of named
superclasses (superclasses cannot be arbitrary expressions)...."
Does this mean that I cannot classify the following fragment as OWL lite
<owl:Class rdf:ID="a">
<owl:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="foo"/>
<owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="bar"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</owl:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
But if I parse this using Jena and convert into a triple format, a class
name is generated for the anonymous superclass. Would this be OWL lite now?
Regards,
Mithun Sheshagiri
Received on Friday, 18 June 2004 14:41:27 UTC