- From: Pete Johnston <p.johnston@ukoln.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:25:55 +0100
- To: 'www-rdf-interest' <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <003001c4497f$107258a0$2392268a@ulpcpj>
Richard said: > The ideal that I am striving for would be a combination of the two. > With the type of contributor specified within the ordered list. While > slightly more verbose this seems to do the trick: > <rdf:RDF> > <bib:Citable> > <bib:Contributors rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <rdf:li rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <marcrel:aut rdf:resource="#Kamereddine" /></rdf:li> > <rdf:li rdf:parseType="Resource"> <marcrel:aut rdf:resource="#Nederpelt" /></rdf:li> > > </bib:Contributors> > > </bib:Citable> > </rdf:RDF > > This appeard to be valid with the Validator but what are > peoples thoughts on it? I think this says the two instances of foaf:Person are the authors (marcrel:aut) of the intermediate nodes (i.e. the objects of rdf:_1, rdf:_2)? See graph attached. It seems to me that's different from saying they are the authors of the instance of bib:Citable, which I think is what you want to say? cf. your examples A1, A3, where you do use marcrel:aut as a property of the instance of bib:Citable. Pete
Attachments
- image/png attachment: bib2.png
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 11:24:41 UTC