- From: Pete Johnston <p.johnston@ukoln.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:25:55 +0100
- To: 'www-rdf-interest' <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <003001c4497f$107258a0$2392268a@ulpcpj>
Richard said:
> The ideal that I am striving for would be a combination of the two.
> With the type of contributor specified within the ordered list. While
> slightly more verbose this seems to do the trick:
> <rdf:RDF>
> <bib:Citable>
> <bib:Contributors rdf:parseType="Resource">
> <rdf:li rdf:parseType="Resource">
> <marcrel:aut rdf:resource="#Kamereddine" /></rdf:li>
> <rdf:li rdf:parseType="Resource">
<marcrel:aut rdf:resource="#Nederpelt" /></rdf:li>
>
> </bib:Contributors>
>
> </bib:Citable>
> </rdf:RDF
>
> This appeard to be valid with the Validator but what are
> peoples thoughts on it?
I think this says the two instances of foaf:Person are the authors
(marcrel:aut) of the intermediate nodes (i.e. the objects of rdf:_1,
rdf:_2)? See graph attached.
It seems to me that's different from saying they are the authors of the
instance of bib:Citable, which I think is what you want to say? cf. your
examples A1, A3, where you do use marcrel:aut as a property of the
instance of bib:Citable.
Pete
Attachments
- image/png attachment: bib2.png
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 11:24:41 UTC