- From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:59:43 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On Feb 25, 2004, at 12:04 PM, Dave Beckett wrote: > > The key issue is as long as you know what kind of context is being > used; > we identified three types at a SWADE workshop[1]: > 1) source URI (where the triples came from, usually always a URI) > 2) subgraph/submodel identifier > 3) an internal/statement identifier > > You have to be clear what you are defining for context. indeed - that workshop was definitively useful and it should be a good starting point for any future work about that - and I guess the best way it would be to start surveying some good/sane use-cases or scenarios of usage of contexts, provenance, graph naming, dark-triples, quads, sources, spaces, domains (how many terms have we got for the "same" thing? :) and how to query/treat those in our applications - I set up some query use-case for "naming" sometime ago http://rdfstore.sourceforge.net/2002/06/24/rdf-query/query-use- cases.html#11 - feel free to add you own tool-specific examples to that. Another way it would be to approach this problem bottom up, and designing/inventing some very simple RDF vocabulary to let people to express such things in their RDF/XML today - but I understand this is not the proper way - actually the other way round :) > > I'd say that adding anything to rdf:RDF will break parsers; they are > entitled > to assume that it can have no attributes other than those specified in > the syntax. yes - I would not like too much extending existing RDF/XML syntax in that direction i.e. making it not backward compatible > > rdf:RDF could have been used to label graphs and sub graphs but again, > the WG left this alone. The question of "what does naming a > graph/subgraph mean?" seems the first and most important thing to > answer. yep fully agree - that is the question we need to answer - even though we have got applications to write today which need such useful extensions ;) definitively something to start to think and talk about in the upcoming future. cheers Alberto > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/dev_workshop_report_4/#sec- > context
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 10:59:33 UTC