- From: Lynn, James (Software Services) <james.lynn@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:04:12 -0500
- To: "Jon Hanna" <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
If we were talking about natural language, we would use adverbs. I know him well. I hardly know him. I know him casually. In RDF, how can we constrain a predicate? > -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jon Hanna > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:53 AM > To: Jeremy Carroll > Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: Re: SemWeb in Guardian newspaper > > > > Quoting Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>: > > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,1150657,00.html > > > > [[ > > "It's 'out of control' by design," says Brickley. > > ]] > > > > (it being foaf) > > > > I'm still not sure who I foaf:know! > > Okay, the extremes are easy; I foaf:know my wife and kids, I > don't foaf:know the > guy I can currently see walking past the window. However it's > more interesting > (for the moment) to foaf:know people where I can find their > FOAF files. > > Do I foaf:know Dan Brickley? we've chatted on IRC a tiny bit, > exchanged a couple > of emails (mainly him complaining about my quoting style). Do > I foaf:know > everyone who regularly posts on this list? Really they seem > like the people who > foaf:knowing can lead to the most wasted hours browsing > through FOAF-a-naut > (currently a rather dull experience with my FOAF file, which > is completely > foaf:ignorant). > > Do I foaf:know Jade from Big Brother? Despite my best efforts > I foaf:know a lot > more about her than I care to. > > Do I foaf:know everyone I once foaf:knew? If so FOAF could be > a disaster for > those who would prefer to avoid past lovers (this should > neither be taken as an > admission that I wish to avoid past lovers, nor as an > invitiation for them to > get in touch). > > The problem perhaps is not so much what foaf:know entails, as > what it implies. > When someone is murdered and we hear that they are "known to > the police" we are > apparantly to understand that they are known to the police for a very > particular reason, to be foaf:known to the police (and have > this tracked by an > automated agent) could be disasterous. Just to be on the safe > side I have a > policy of never developing friendships with anyone involved in > law-enforcement. > > -- > Jon Hanna > <http://www.hackcraft.net/> > *Thought provoking quote goes here* > >
Received on Friday, 20 February 2004 08:07:00 UTC