- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:30:34 -0500
- To: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Cc: "www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> I'm still not sure who I foaf:know!
[ Is there a foaf-designers list? Hmmm. I guess the meta-point is
applicable to all of RDF anyway. ]
Every day or so I get asked by Orkut whether so-and-so is my "friend".
It's very challenging. Then it asks me if I'm that persons "fan", and how
"sexy", "trustworthy", and "cool" I want to say they are. Ouch.
I usually trying to apply, "Signal is any difference that makes a
difference" [Bateson79] in ontology design, paying attention to
measurable effects on behavior. That is: how will people and agents
act differently if they know one triple vs another? How would someone
or something act differently if they knew I foaf:know danbri? Like
you, I don't have much clue.
I can think of a few approaches which might help:
1. Stick to observable facts, preferably with links to
documentation (so others can make at least second-hand
observations). Co-workers, spouses, roommates, classmates,
[cellmates :-) ], etc. Nothing emotional here; just the
externally-visible and hopefully documented facts of the
relationship. DanBri and I spoke to each other once at a
party, which is factual, but not fully documentable. There is
bi-directional 1-1 e-mail traffic between us, going back to
such-and-such a date. We've attended many of the same meetings
(where we'd both be listed among the attendees). Etc....
2. Express feelings in clearly emotional terms. I usually feel
happy about DanBri walking into a room I'm in, in a social
setting, and in a work setting. (Some people I'm happy to see
in one context but not the other.) I just asked my 7-year-old
for a test for closeness among people, and he suggested two:
(1) whether you're excited to see them, and (2) whether you hug
them.
3. State predications, offers, and/or committments. DanBri can
safely interupt me nearly any time in a work context or a
social one, but probably not a family one. I expect to see
him F2F about 3 times a year. etc....
Obviously, a lot of this could be very private information (foaf:hugs
sounds like a dangerous start), but that's a different question.
There's the FOAF data I share only with my computer, and there's a
small subset of that which I tell it to share with the world. And
there's some data in between, which I share with my co-workers, etc.
One might also share only with trusted match-making services, to
provide the kind of anonymizing which Orkut does with
sexy/trusty/cool.
-- sandro
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 11:27:26 UTC