- From: Hamish Harvey <david.harvey@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:37:09 +0000
- To: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On Wednesday 18 Feb 2004 8:26 pm, Benjamin Nowack wrote:
> there are lots of approaches (all with their own advantages and
> disadvantages) that try to allow you to distinguish between the described
> resource, the rdf representation of the description and maybe an additional
> human-friendly representation, but at the moment they are still all
> proprietary..
Have any pointers to these, even just googleable names?
What do you mean by "proprietary" here? That they aren't "standard", be it de
facto or de jure? Or that they,
"protected by trademark or patent or copyright; made or
produced or distributed by one having exclusive rights;" (WordNet)?
Cheers,
Hamish
--
Hamish Harvey, PhD
Network Coordinator, FloodRiskNet (http://www.floodrisknet.org.uk/) and
Research Assistant, Water and Environmental Management Research Centre,
University of Bristol
Home page: http://www.cen.bris.ac.uk/pgra/dph/dph.htm
Weblog: http://hamish.blogs.com/
Tel: +44 (0) 117 928 8883 Fax: +44 (0) 117 928 7783
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 04:42:56 UTC