- From: Jennifer Golbeck <golbeck@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:59:16 -0500 (EST)
- To: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Thanks for pointing this out. I've corrected the example to use the rdf:Resource notation that I actually intended. Thanks, Jen On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Masahide Kanzaki wrote: > Hello Jennifer, it's interesting project. > > I'm not sure on your description of ontology at > http://trust.mindswap.org/trustOnt.shtml regarding 'Subject Specific > Rating'. Your example says: > > <trust:trust10 rdf:resource="#jenGolbeck"> > <rdfs:subject rdf:resource="http://trust.mindswap.org"/> > </trust:trust10> > > This cannot generate proper triple provided trust:trust10 is a property of > foaf:Person. Perhaps you want to write something like this (guess from your > previous paper): > > <Pesron rdf:nodeID="me"> > <trust:trust10> > <trust:TrustsRegarding> > <trust:trustsPerson rdf:resource="#jenGolbeck"/> > <dc:subject rdf:resource="http://trust.mindswap.org"/> > </trust:TrustsRegarding> > </trust:trust10> > </Pesron> > > Unfortunately, your ontology defines the range of trust:trust10 as > foaf:Person, so the above is not possible. (and, maybe you want to use > dc:subject rather than rdfs:subject, the latter means the subject of an RDF > statement). > > I think trust on a specific subject is much easier and appropriate to rate > than a simple trust on a person, and hope this section of your ontology > will be refined. > > Gook luck on your project ! > > regards, > > -- > KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka > http://kanzaki.com/info/webwho.rdf > mailto:webmaster(at)kanzaki.com > #Please use above address for a personal mail > #instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only. >
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 02:59:21 UTC