- From: Chris Wilper <cwilper@cs.cornell.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:34:34 -0500
- To: "Rhoads, Stephen" <SRhoads@thrupoint.net>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2004 20:34:36 UTC
I like your "wrapper" approach best. The idea that a "distribution of a product" has a price (rather than the more abstract "product") seems most logical. The "instance of" approach seems awkward, and the "context" approach makes it hard to answer questions across the different graphs....but I'm curious to hear what other people think. - Chris -----Original Message----- From: Rhoads, Stephen [mailto:SRhoads@thrupoint.net] Sent: Tue 2/17/2004 7:12 PM To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org Cc: Subject: "Locally-Significant" Statements Folks, I would appreciate some guidance as to the best approach to the problem of what I will call (for lack of a better term) making locally significant statements about a resource. I have identified three approaches which I am calling "Wrapper", "InstanceOf", and "Context". Take the example below. General Mills manufactures an ex:Cereal called (..snipped...)
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2004 20:34:36 UTC