On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Andrew Newman wrote: > >> I'm not sure how TriX is solving the human readability problem, if >> anything the paper seems to suggest that RDF/XML is more readable than >> simple triple based formats and it is still machine readable. > > >That is my position, not sure about Patrick. >I think neither of us are particularly convinced that RDF should be being >entered by hand, without editor support. I have a similar approach. It is good that it is possible to write RDF by hand (something it can inherit from XML, if that is a blessed syntax). In particular because it is easy to make tools that generate RDF, and test them. But I don't think that people hand-editing code is a serious use case. It isn't the case in HTML or XML, where a few adepts do it and millions of others have some interface they understand that produces some code they just trust. Cheers ChaalsReceived on Saturday, 14 February 2004 17:56:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:47 UTC