- From: Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:33:43 +0200
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Andrew Newman <andrew@pisoftware.com>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Carroll wrote: | I think neither of us are particularly convinced that RDF should be | being entered by hand, without editor support. While editors are a great thing, and I'm working on one =), I'd say it's almost a truism that it's important that they are not *required*. Being able to delve in, fire up emacs and write up statements is for some reason in some situations still the way to go; an example that comes to mind is fixing some problem with some graph through a console ssh session. See also how many people are entering HTML by hand, even though it's much easier to do with a decent graphical editor. - - Benja -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFALMQnUvR5J6wSKPMRAryoAKDS2DEipOY9gLv3fEWWAVy440pquwCeJ4co my0sjieRTU7mWFxIBeCSIvI= =QftY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 13 February 2004 07:34:02 UTC