At 18:34 05/02/04 +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: >On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 05:56:19PM +0000, Graham Klyne wrote: > > BTW, Chris, in my original response to you, I didn't advocate using > > reification (though I did once argue its use as a way to abstractly > > represent quads in "pure" RDF). > >Is there an anti-reification cabal? ;-) Not really. But what we did come to understand through many debates was that "reification" as originally described was not the solution to as many problems as it was once believed to be. #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#ContactReceived on Friday, 6 February 2004 09:16:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:47 UTC