Re: Time-sensitive resources using RDF?

Are we trying to coordinate SWIG comments?

A possible approach might be for everyone to make individual comments, 
and than Dan (as SWIG chair) to make a first pass and suggest both the 
publishing WG, and the commentors, for some comments to be treated as 
duplicates.

I guess we're talking three or four people who might get round to it.

Another approach might be for Dan in a last pass on the 10th (or 
possibly just before) to propose such a merge as a formal SWIG comment, 
subject to an e-mail vote!

e.g.
[[
Some SWIG members have made individual comments. The SWIG would like the 
following to be treated as IG comments:

- 'topic name'
    See
        comment URL 1, part c
        comment URL 2, part 3

- 'topic name'
    See
       ....

]]

This would help the WG see the wood for the trees, and give some sense 
of the IG consensus, or not.


Jeremy


Dan Brickley wrote:
> * Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> [2004-12-22 11:13-0500]
> 
>>* Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2004-12-22 15:01+0000]
>>
>>>
>>>A quick glance at this thread indicates that you haven't yet mentioned:
>>>
>>>http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-DPF-20041122/
>>>
>>>Dynamic Properties Framework (DPF)
>>>    22 November 2004, David Raggett, Rafah A. Hosn, Sailesh Sathish, 
>>>Keith Waters
>>>    Last Call Ends 10 January 2005
>>>
>>>While this is not in RDF it is about time-sensitive properties of 
>>>resources - hmmm is that the same as time-sensitive resources??
>>
>>Oh wow, that's in Last Call already. Thanks for the reminder!
> 
> 
> I sent some comments,
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-multimodal/2004Dec/0004.html
>   DPF comments: relation to RDF properties; cardinality; property declarations
> 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-multimodal/2004Dec/0005.html
>   Defining event types in terms of DPF-based expressions?
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Dan
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 23 December 2004 12:23:50 UTC