- From: Laurian Gridinoc <laurian@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:42:17 +0200
- To: Dom Vonarburg <dom@rorweb.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hello, On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:47:22 -0500, Dom Vonarburg <dom@rorweb.com> wrote: > Thanks for the info. Do you have an RDF example of the use of criteria? The idea would be: <?xml version="1.0"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://example.net/rep#"> <rdfs:Resource rdf:about="http://www.example.net/"> <representedBy> <rdf:Alt> <!-- Representations subClassOf rdf:Alt --> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://example.net/rep#Representations" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.example.net/en/" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.example.net/jp/" /> <decidedBy rdf:resource="http://example.net/rep#LanguageNegociation" /> </rdf:Alt> </representedBy> </rdfs:Resource> </rdf:RDF> A resource holds a bag of alternate representations, and a selection criterion attached to the bag. The above example validates, but I think it's a bit wrong, anyway the graph shows the idea. > More types of relationships will definitely be added to ROR. A bag to allow `direct' resource composition (not by the property resourceOf), would be helpful, such that on that bag other statements can be made. I doubt that rdf:SeeAlso can be used for this, it might be too generic. Cheers, -- Laurian Gridinoc Chief Developer GRAPEFRUIT www.grapefruit.ro
Received on Monday, 20 December 2004 23:42:20 UTC