- From: Laurian Gridinoc <laurian@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:42:17 +0200
- To: Dom Vonarburg <dom@rorweb.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hello,
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:47:22 -0500, Dom Vonarburg <dom@rorweb.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Do you have an RDF example of the use of criteria?
The idea would be:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns="http://example.net/rep#">
<rdfs:Resource rdf:about="http://www.example.net/">
<representedBy>
<rdf:Alt>
<!-- Representations subClassOf rdf:Alt -->
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://example.net/rep#Representations" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.example.net/en/" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.example.net/jp/" />
<decidedBy
rdf:resource="http://example.net/rep#LanguageNegociation" />
</rdf:Alt>
</representedBy>
</rdfs:Resource>
</rdf:RDF>
A resource holds a bag of alternate representations, and a selection
criterion attached to the bag.
The above example validates, but I think it's a bit wrong, anyway the
graph shows the idea.
> More types of relationships will definitely be added to ROR.
A bag to allow `direct' resource composition (not by the property
resourceOf), would be helpful, such that on that bag other statements
can be made. I doubt that rdf:SeeAlso can be used for this, it might
be too generic.
Cheers,
--
Laurian Gridinoc
Chief Developer
GRAPEFRUIT
www.grapefruit.ro
Received on Monday, 20 December 2004 23:42:20 UTC