- From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:09:32 +0100
- To: rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sorry to come late to the party, I've been away. As I recall, the PulpFiction newsreader (Mac) stores every retrieved news item, just like an email client; this is actually quite intuitive, as one doesn't expect an older item to disappear just because there's more recent news. I'm sure the RSS->mail converters do the same. In principle, this data could be made available through an RDF query interface. Non-RSS feeds could be downloaded, parsed, and saved into the same store, then exposed as RDF (obviously a more restricted vocabulary than RSS 1.0). In a more careful world, authors would expose an RSS feed of all their posts for posterity (some already do). However, I would prefer a more intelligent approach to news serialisation, where the client could query with a date range (or a proper query) and get the right results. In an all-RDF system, this could be OWL-QL, RDQL, or some other RDF query language. None of these approaches solve the difficulties of poor description: inaccurate titling, bad markup, missing author markup, categories, and so on. Now I ought to practice what I preach :) -R PS. I'm noodling away on a persistent, system-wide RDF store (based on Redland currently). I'm thinking that a persistent newsreader would be an interesting application. > What role can RSS 1.0 play in the semantic web considering the > transience of the data? Most data in RSS files today won't be there a > month from now, as the files get updated until today's items fall off > the list. Can any connections that would be useful for a web of > information get built from such data?
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 16:52:37 UTC