- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:02:14 +0300
- To: <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>, <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <danbri@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of ext Eric Jain > Sent: 30 August, 2004 09:40 > To: Leo Sauermann > Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org; danbri@w3.org > Subject: Re: Reification - whats best practice? > > > > ... many tools group statements in some way, > usually for > management purposes, and some even allow meta data to be attached to > these groups, graphs, models, or whatever they are called. > > The problem, in my opinion, is that the standard way to exchange this > kind of data requires writing every group of statements into > a separate > file, which may not always be practical. > > This is not necessarily a problem with the RDF data model, Agreed. > but a problem > with the serialization syntax, and one of many issues a > future version > will hopefully address. And until the official, "blessed" RDF serialization does, folks needing to interchange multiple sets (graphs) of statements in a single serialized document can use TriX [1] ;-) Patrick [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/ -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 07:03:28 UTC