- From: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:43:35 +0200
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- CC: Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch, dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 29 August 2004 18:43:46 UTC
>>>Quads are also a bad standard since they >>>mean different things to different people; i.e. not a standard. >>> >>> >>That's precisely why they need to be standardized, to ensure >>that they >>mean the same things to different people :-) >> >> > >+1 > >And my recommendation would be that the fourth component of >a quad would be a graph name (which also would be optional). > > +1 that is super simple and compatible with f,e, rdf-gateway. or ? who would be the person to implement/standardize it? who will hack this in Jena? cheers Leo
Received on Sunday, 29 August 2004 18:43:46 UTC