- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:33:57 +0200
- To: Bob MacGregor <macgregor@isi.edu>
- CC: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, 'RDF interesting groupe' <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Bob MacGregor wrote: > So where is the controversy? Possibly is has to do with the problem > of nested contexts. The > most general solutions allow contexts to contain other contexts. If > the named graph solution > allows one to apply a name to a subgraph of another graph, then it is > supporting exactly the same kind of > nesting. The named document solution does not support nesting. Sorry, could you clarify that last point - if you can refer to a graph through the URI of the container document, then surely can't that URI be used in another graph/document? [accepting all provisos about the approach being a bit hacky] -- Raw http://dannyayers.com
Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 10:37:54 UTC