- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:03:23 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Bob MacGregor <macgregor@isi.edu>, Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>, 'RDF interesting groupe' <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Dan Brickley wrote: >This is a bit of a hack, but in the noble tradition of adding a layer of >indirection to solve a problem. Instead of talking directly about >triples or a graph, you talk about (using whatever RDF vocab you find >appropriate) a document that has that stuff written in it. > > Hmm, how would you say the resource/representations divide lines up against named graphs? Is it safe to partially collapse the indirection and say the graph (in the document) is a representation of the resource? I suppose what I'm wondering about is how you would describe the indirection for reasoning purposes (without disappearing into a reified black hole). Cheers, Danny. -- Raw http://dannyayers.com
Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 10:07:20 UTC