- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:05:07 +0300
- To: 'Charles McCathieNevile' <charles@w3.org>, 'Jonathan Chetwynd' <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Assuming Charles is right hear, then we also have some ontology work on that. Would be glad for your input open it though Jonathan Keep well Lisa > -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Charles > McCathieNevile > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 5:12 PM > To: Jonathan Chetwynd > Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: Re: Do we have an rdf ontology for SEN appropriate > objectives? as used by the BBC > > > > I'm not sure what SEN means. I'm going to make the rash > assumption that it has to do with catering for different > levels of understanding. > > I believe that there is some stuff in the IMS accessibility > work, and in LOM (some classification stuff about learning > objects) that might be suitable. They use XML schemas as a > rule, so it would have to be adapted, but if they do indeed > have a schema covering this stuff it should be relatively > straightforward to adapt it. > > Am I on the right track here? > > cheers > > Chaals > > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: > > > > >Do we have an rdf ontology for SEN appropriate objectives? > as used by > >the BBC: > > > >http://www.bbc.co.uk/cbeebies/grownups/somethingspecial/ > >teachersnotes.shtml > > > >I've tried to develop interest in this for over 2 years, but > have yet > >to see anyone using this or a similar model in RDF. > > > >thanks > > > > > >Jonathan Chetwynd > >http://www.peepo.co.uk "It's easy to use" > >irc://freenode/accessibility > > > > > > Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles > tel: +61 409 134 136 > SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe fax(france): > +33 4 92 38 78 22 > Post: 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia or > W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France >
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2004 15:04:45 UTC