- From: Thomas B. Passin <tpassin@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:42:57 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Lars Marius Garshol wrote: > | another questions, do you guys consider TMs as a SW technologies. > | ermmm, i persoally think TMs is one kind of SW technolgies. as i > | read some others paper, someone seemed to point that TMs is one of > | SW technologies, so how do u guys think of it? > > That's a good question. I know the organizers of the International > Semantic Web Conference considered doing a panel on this question, so > I guess the answer is somewhat unclear. Some people would say no, > others yes (and I think you'd find W3C people in both camps). > Personally, I can't really answer that, since I'm not sure what it > means to be a semantic web technology. I would say that topic maps can be used as part of Semantic Web technology, and that they are reasonably well suited for the purpose. I would also say that I haven't seen people actually *using* them that way so far. Cheers, Tom P -- Thomas B. Passin Explorer's Guide to the Semantic Web (Manning Books) http://www.manning.com/catalog/view.php?book=passin
Received on Monday, 16 August 2004 13:41:52 UTC