- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:12:01 +0200
- To: sandy_lub@yahoo.com
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
fyi, one of the leading tools for brainstorming-style concept mapping, CmapTools, can be found at [1]. Some other related software are amongst the links at [2]. What also may be of interest in the KM space are Conceptual Graphs (CGs) [3] that are an approach to expressing logical statements in a node & arc form. Some work has been done on mapping these to Topic Maps [4] (sorry, best I could Google - any more, Lars?) and RDF [5]. [1] http://cmap.ihmc.us/ [2] http://dannyayers.com/ideagraph-blog/archives/cat_related_software.html [3] http://www.jfsowa.com/cg/index.htm [4] http://www.techquila.com/cgi-bin/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=41 [5] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/CG.html Lars Marius Garshol wrote: >Hi Sandy, > >* Sandy Pan >| >| i am doing some research in knowledge representation, there are many >| technologies to be used, and i am interested in both Topic Maps and >| Concept Map. can anyone enlighten me there differences on these two >| technologies. some difference has been point out on ... >| >| Concept Map emphasizes more on visual sense whereas TMs emphasized >| on mathematical sense. >| >| Concept Map is formalized as named nodes and labeled arcs whereas >| TMs mainly deal withs TAOs and suchas. >| >| so any more ideas on the differences, or how to compare these two >| technologies, or what criteria should i concern. > >I think you've got the basic idea right, that concept maps are more of >a visual technique that's intended for sketching, brainstorming, and >illustration, while topic maps are a knowledge technology, which is >intended to be used to create applications. So there's a huge >difference in emphasis, and I would say that they are really different >kinds of things; one being a technique, and the other a technology. > >Further, topic maps are an ISO standard, while I don't think concept >maps have been formalized even as a visual technique (though I might >be wrong), and there is (again as far as I know) no interchange format >for concept maps, nor any schema or query language. > > > -- Raw http://dannyayers.com
Received on Friday, 13 August 2004 10:19:12 UTC