- From: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 23:51:52 +0200
- To: Laurian Gridinoc <laurian@gmail.com>, Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>
- Cc: Stephen Rhoads <rhoadsnyc@mac.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Phil Dawes wrote: > > I might be missing something, but this sounds like a bad idea to > > me. XML/HTML is good for documents because of its implicit > > ordering. RDF doesnt have this, and so will require a lots of explicit > > information to describe the order. you can say this content is a header, and then allow other pieces of content to have a property to be under that header. - much les ambiguous then what falls under what in XHTML In terms of reading order of paragraph -a link list approach (this paragraph follows that paragraph) is more flexible then ordered ID because you can insert a paragraph without changing other refrences Keep well all
Received on Saturday, 7 August 2004 21:52:28 UTC