- From: Laurian Gridinoc <laurian@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:29:02 +0000
- To: Stephen Rhoads <rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 19:01:42 -0400, Stephen Rhoads <rhoadsnyc@mac.com> wrote: > Has it occurred to anyone else that perhaps "RDF in HTML" is the wrong approach, and that what is really needed is "HTML in RDF"? > The idea would be to build an OWL ontology to describe the elements and layout of HTML documents so that the images, text and other elements could be "annotated" (for lack of a more profound word) directly. Shouldn't this be "XML in RDF" then extended (by annotation?) to "XHTML in RDF"? Could this start upon "An RDF Schema for the XML Information Set" (W3C Note 6 April 2001) [1] or there are already better ontologies for the infoset? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset-rdfs Cheers, -- Laurian Gridinoc Chief Developer GRAPEFRUIT DESIGN www.gd.ro
Received on Friday, 6 August 2004 05:29:27 UTC