- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 03:51:55 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Lisa Seeman <lisa@ubaccess.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
It sounds like what you want to to is have rdf;resources as the object of a triple (as well as being the predicate). for example: http://foo#bar example:contentType example:subhead eaxmple:subhead rdf:subClass example:heading so that you can tell that http://foo#bar is a heading of some kind, if you understand RDF schema but not example:subhead Right? If so, the answer is yes, this is fine. Just check that the particular models you make say what you mean - validate the schema, look at its graph, and then write some examples, and validate those to make sure you don't get the wrong things merging... cheers Chaals On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Libby Miller wrote: >hi Lisa > >On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Lisa Seeman wrote: > >> I have a controversial question hear (ok, maybe it is not that controversial) >> >> I am thinking of using RDF instances from schema as objects of a >triple as appose to being used as predicates. >> The reason I am doing that is because i want the objects themselves >to have clear relationships, be extendable etc . > >Could you give some specific examples of what you want to do? > >Libby > Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22 Post: 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia or W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 03:52:03 UTC