- From: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:04:13 +0100
- To: david.harvey@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hamish Harvey writes: > > > Because a lot of the time there *isn't* a document! > > > > E.g. The information comes back as the result of a query against a > > remote RDF store. This is method used for obtaining RDF data in all of > > the semantic-web applications I've been involved in writing. > > Do those RDF stores allow a query to be expressed as a GETable URI? So you > could say > > blah owl:imports <query URI> . > Actually I meant that there isn't a document to contain the owl:imports terms, unless the query engine puts them into every query result graph - I haven't given this much thought, but that doesn't sound very workable to me. Cheers, Phil
Received on Sunday, 25 April 2004 05:42:59 UTC