- From: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sf.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:28:12 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: patrick.stickler@nokia.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Peter F. Patel-Schneider writes: > > In the absence of any indication to the > contrary, it is generally a good idea to have some mechanism that provides > a base mechanism for picking up information about terms. However, why > should there not be a mechanism (such as owl:imports) that can be used by > the creator of a document to indicate where other information of terms used > in the document, including information that could be deemed to provide > `definitions' for terms in the document, can be found? Because a lot of the time there *isn't* a document! E.g. The information comes back as the result of a query against a remote RDF store. This is method used for obtaining RDF data in all of the semantic-web applications I've been involved in writing. Cheers, Phil
Received on Friday, 23 April 2004 04:31:48 UTC