- From: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sf.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:17:47 +0100
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi Patrick, Patrick Stickler writes: > > Note that providing a formal, RDF description via MGET does not preclude > or impact providing representations of the employee in traditional web > fashion via GET, etc. > I know it sounds stupid, but that hadn't actually occured to me. MGET is not only - A mechanism for getting information about an HTTP URI But also: - A mechanism for accertaining *authoritative* information about an HTTP URI Where authoritative means currently intended by the author - correct? So when setting up a URI query facility for my terms, I should put statements that I author and consider authoritative at the end of an MGET query, and other arbitrary RDF about the URI (e.g. external statements where the URI is the object, links to external queryably sources, etc..), at the end of a GET 303-redirect. Does this sound reasonable? Cheers, Phil
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2004 05:21:16 UTC