- From: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sf.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:02:42 +0100
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi Patrick, Patrick Stickler writes: > > > On Apr 19, 2004, at 14:48, ext Phil Dawes wrote: > > > The main problem with Patrick's concise-bounded-description idea from > > this respect is how to find references to a term. > > Snip [...] > > This has nothing to do with the definition of concise bounded > descriptions > (which simply define a particular kind of RDF sub-graph focused on a > particular resource). > > URIQA does not attempt to provide a general query language/solution, but > is expected to work in harmony with any number of general query > solutions > (such as is the focus of the RDF Data Access Working Group). > > Thus, there is no "problem" with not providing functionality that was > never intended to be provided. Apologies if this wasn't clear, but my mail was intended to mean 'the problem with using URIQA from the perspective of using it for open-ended queries'. (hence the 'from this respect' bit) I didn't mean to imply that there was a problem with URIQA from the perspective of its intended goals - sorry for that. Cheers, Phil
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2004 05:07:51 UTC