- From: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sf.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:27:25 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Peter F. Patel-Schneider writes: > From: "Phil Dawes" <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: Distributed querying on the semantic web > Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:19:28 +0100 > > > All true. However the web shows us that people publishing information > > do tend to go to some lengths to ensure that it is as accessible and > > usable as possible. I suspect that if it becomes a convention that > > agents go to the URI when they don't have any other information, > > people will endeavour to put useful information there. > > Sure, and this would be really good. However, I firmly believe that there > must not be any requirement, or even expectation, that this is *the* > information about a URI reference. It must be possible, and not > stigmatized, to have different views concerning URI references. > Ah - I see your point now. It's not that you don't think that having information at the URI is a bad thing, it's that you don't think it should be considered the *authoritative* description of that information. I think I agree with you here - better to let society decide what information it trusts and wants to use rather than mandating it. Cheers, Phil
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2004 05:28:48 UTC