- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 10:10:43 +0100
- To: "www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
[snip, dates in namespace and ontology URIs] > Well, I myself prefer to use major version numbers rather than dates, > e.g. > > http://www.semanticplanet.com/rdft-1/ > Without much management you can be pretty sure you aren't going to reuse http://www.semanticplanet.com/2003/08/rdft, but http://www.semanticplanet.com/rdft-1/ is more likely to get reused (if you're in the business of producing uris with the string "rdf" in them, other people would have other URIs they would be likely to accidently reuse). Large concerns could find it difficult to prevent different developers reusing URIs (now there's an answer to what a "namespace document" should be; ...<p>I'm using this URI, find another</p>... :) On balance I prefer your approach, but I see the point of the dates. -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "…it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 05:10:45 UTC