- From: James Carlyle <james.carlyle@takepart.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:53:17 +0100
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Phil, > > I'm now considering using opaque numbers in URIs to > represent things - > > e.g. http://sw.example.com/2003/01/application/23 - and am > wondering > > if other people do this and what their experiences are. In > particular, > > what would be the advantages/disadvantages of working in a > world where > > URIs contain little human-readable information? I wonder if there is something to learn from the relational database world. Your question reminds me of the selection criteria for table primary keys: Not Null: Will the candidate value ever be null? Brevity: Is the candidate value more than a single column? Simplicity: Does the candidate value contain embedded spaces, special characters, or differential capitalization? Data Type: Is the candidate value something other than a number or fixed-length character data type? Nonidentifying Value: Does the candidate value contain any intelligence or have any meaning? Never Change: Is the candidate value likely to change? (taken from http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Print.cfm?ArticleID=5113, more explanation of each point there.) Kind regards James Carlyle http://semanticplanet.com
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 05:51:51 UTC