www-rdf-interest@w3.org from September 2003 by date

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

• RE: Announcement: The "info" URI Scheme Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)
• RE: Announcement: The "info" URI Scheme Jeremy Carroll
• Announcement: The "info" URI Scheme Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)
• Re: AW: Literals representing people? Patrick Stickler
• Re: AW: Literals representing people? Nick Gibbins
• Re: RDF Extension jon@spin.ie
• RDF Extension Federico Rozados

Monday, 29 September 2003

• Re: AW: Literals representing people? Thomas B. Passin
• in the uri crisis again ? (identifying persons, objects, ...) Leo Sauermann
• Re: Literals representing people? Bill de hÓra
• Re: Literals representing people? Bill de hÓra
• RE: AW: Literals representing people? LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)
• Re: AW: Literals representing people? Libby Miller
• Re: AW: Literals representing people? Patrick Stickler
• Program/Agenda Workshop on Practical and Scalable Semantic Systems (PSSS 2003) Raphael Volz
• Re: AW: Literals representing people? Thomas B. Passin
• Re: AW: Literals representing people? Patrick Stickler
• AW: Literals representing people? Leo Sauermann
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Graham Klyne
• Re: Literals representing people? Graham Klyne
• AW: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Leo Sauermann
• Re: Literals representing people? Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 28 September 2003

• Re: Literals representing people? Bill de hÓra
• Literals representing people? (was: Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource) Benja Fallenstein
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Garret Wilson
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Benja Fallenstein
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Garret Wilson
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Benja Fallenstein
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Garret Wilson

Saturday, 27 September 2003

• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Sandro Hawke
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Garret Wilson
• Re: Correct Owl representation Thomas B. Passin
• RE: Correct Owl representation Deepali.Khushraj@nokia.com

Friday, 26 September 2003

• Re: Correct Owl representation Benjamin Nowack
• Correct Owl representation Monika Solanki
• Re: Please Review: RDFCore WG new specs (2003-11-05), esp. w.r.t. I18N and XMLLiteral Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 24 September 2003

• Announcement: Sesame 0.96 released Arjohn Kampman
• [ANN] sw-announce mailing list Ian Davis
• Re: Pient: Extending N-Triples, Subsetting N3 Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 23 September 2003

• Pient: Extending N-Triples, Subsetting N3 Sean B. Palmer

Monday, 22 September 2003

• Proceedings of Semantic Technologies for eGov - White House Conference Center, September 8th rhodgson

Sunday, 21 September 2003

• Re: Need hint for parsing Open Directory RDF Dave Beckett
• Need hint for parsing Open Directory RDF Jan Algermissen

Friday, 19 September 2003

• Re: "proprietary", was Re: Enumeration in RDF? Patrick Stickler
• Re: [dm-discuss] EAV Model and RDF Leonid Ototsky

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• Re: [dm-discuss] EAV Model and RDF Adrian Walker
• [ANN] OWL Test Results Page & Web Form Sandro Hawke
• Re: Hidden triples and self-description Mark Baker
• Re: Enumeration in RDF? Dan Brickley
• RE: Enumeration in RDF? Graham Klyne
• [ACM technews]: "Semantic Web: Out of the Theory Realm" Graham Klyne
• "proprietary", was Re: Enumeration in RDF? Sandro Hawke
• RE: Enumeration in RDF? LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)
• ANN: Joseki 2.0.0 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: "Email Updates Six Degrees Theory" Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
• "Email Updates Six Degrees Theory" Graham Klyne
• RE: Enumeration in RDF? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Wednesday, 17 September 2003

• Re: Enumeration in RDF? Francesco Cannistrà
• Please Review: RDFCore WG new specs (2003-11-05), esp. w.r.t. I18N and XMLLiteral Dan Brickley
• RE: Enumeration in RDF? LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)
• RE: Enumeration in RDF Sbodio, Marco Luca
• RE: Enumeration in RDF? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
• Re: Enumeration in RDF? Garret Wilson
• Re: Enumeration in RDF? Yuzhong Qu

Tuesday, 16 September 2003

• Re: Enumeration in RDF? Benja Fallenstein
• Re: Enumeration in RDF? Garret Wilson
• Re: Enumeration in RDF Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
• RE: Enumeration in RDF? Sbodio, Marco Luca
• Partnering Enquiry from CifroSoft LLC (Russia) Vitaly Demin
• Re: Enumeration in RDF? Patrick Stickler
• Re: Is RDF What I'm Looking For? Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 15 September 2003

• RE: [udef.builders] AW: Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, Semantic Web an John Hardin
• RE: [udef.builders] Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, Sema ntic Web and O John Hardin
• [udef.builders] Fwd: Interested in proofs/pilots John Hardin
• [udef.builders] Fwd: Re: [seweb-list] Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, John Hardin
• RE: [udef.builders] Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, Semantic Web and On John Hardin
• Re: Enumeration in RDF? Dan Brickley
• Enumeration in RDF? Art.Barstow@nokia.com
• Re: Hidden triples and self-description Jonathan Borden
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Frank Manola
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Karsten Otto
• Re: Hidden triples and self-description Karsten Otto
• Re: Hidden triples and self-description Bill de hÓra
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Graham Klyne
• Europe and US hotel offers Morris Adams
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Sandro Hawke
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Rahul Singh
• Re: Hidden triples and self-description Mark Baker

Sunday, 14 September 2003

• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Sandro Hawke
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Rahul Singh
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Garret Wilson
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Sandro Hawke
• Re: relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Graham Klyne
• Re: Hidden triples and self-description Bill de hÓra
• relationship of rdfs:Literal to rdfs:Resource Garret Wilson
• Re: Hidden triples and self-description Mark Baker

Saturday, 13 September 2003

• Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, Semantic Web and Ontology Communities john hardin
• Is RDF What I'm Looking For? Chuck Irvine
• Re: Hidden triples and self-description Jonathan Borden
• Re: Hidden triples and self-description Mark Baker
• Re: Hidden triples and self-description Thomas B. Passin
• Hidden triples and self-description Mark Baker
• Re: A quick intro to the RDF data model. Thomas B. Passin

Friday, 12 September 2003

• Re: WWW2004 CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS john hardin
• ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway 1.0.3 released Geoff Chappell
• Re: A quick intro to the RDF data model. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: A quick intro to the RDF data model. Thomas B. Passin
• Re: A quick intro to the RDF data model. Adrian Walker
• Re[2]: OWL mismatch example: Taxonomies VS. the semantic web? Benjamin Nowack
• Re[2]: OWL mismatch example: Taxonomies VS. the semantic web? Benjamin Nowack

Thursday, 11 September 2003

• Survey on usage of Reified Statements? Bob MacGregor
• Guided exploration on RDF and OWL test cases Arjohn Kampman
• Re: OWL mismatch example: Taxonomies VS. the semantic web? Morten Christensen
• A quick intro to the RDF data model. Aredridel
• Re: OWL mismatch example: Taxonomies VS. the semantic web? Thomas B. Passin

Wednesday, 10 September 2003

• nXML editing mode for GNU Emacs - with RDF/XML RelaxNG schema Dave Beckett
• Re: OWL mismatch example: Taxonomies VS. the semantic web? Benjamin Nowack
• Re: OWL mismatch example: Taxonomies VS. the semantic web? Morten Christensen
• OWL mismatch example: Taxonomies VS. the semantic web? Morten Christensen
• Announce: TreeHugger 0.1 - XSLT for RDF Damian Steer
• RE: Representing temporal data in RDF Leo Sauermann

Tuesday, 9 September 2003

• RE: Representing temporal data in RDF Bob MacGregor
• Re: Representing temporal data in RDF Richard H. McCullough
• RE: Representing temporal data in RDF Adrian Walker
• Re: Representing temporal data in RDF Bob MacGregor
• RE: Representing temporal data in RDF Geoff Chappell
• RE: Representing temporal data in RDF Geoff Chappell
• Re: Representing temporal data in RDF Richard H. McCullough
• Representing temporal data in RDF Bob MacGregor
• context, questions, commands, assignments disguised as RDF triples Richard H. McCullough
• FU Berlin. Position as research associate Semantic Web / Project KnowledgeNets Robert Tolksdorf
• RE: OWL : Taxonomies VS. the semantic web a mismatch? Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Monday, 8 September 2003

• ANNOUNCEMENT: Redland RDF Application Framework 0.9.14 Dave Beckett
• Guilty? You Decide! Famous Trials
• Re: abbreviated RDF/XML was Re: Why does OWL have an XML presentation syntax? Jonathan Borden
• Re: OWL : Taxonomies VS. the semantic web a mismatch? Jonathan Borden
• cfp: JoDI Special Issue on New Applications of Knowledge Organization Systems Dan Brickley
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Raptor RDF Parser Toolkit 1.0.0 Dave Beckett
• OWL : Taxonomies VS. the semantic web ? a mismatch? Morten Christensen
• Re: [CWM] Question about notation, restoring trees out of triples Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF implementation reports Dmitry Borodaenko
• [CWM] Question about notation, restoring trees out of triples James Michael DuPont
• RE: literals and XMLLiterals Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Sunday, 7 September 2003

• Re: identifiers and literal semantics Jonathan Borden

Saturday, 6 September 2003

• literals and XMLLiterals Garret Wilson
• mkr2cyc: #$ist #$defnIff ... Richard H. McCullough
• identifiers and literal semantics Garret Wilson
• Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: RDF Templates - Updated Specification and First Implementation Damian Steer
• mkecyc: new "standalone" user interface Richard H. McCullough

Friday, 5 September 2003

• ANNOUNCEMENT: RDF Templates - Updated Specification and First Implementation Ian Davis
• RDF Cookbook Re: Using RDF in XML documents Karl Dubost
• abbreviated RDF/XML was Re: Why does OWL have an XML presentation syntax? Matt Halstead
• Why did the chicken cross the road? Richard H. McCullough

Thursday, 4 September 2003

• Re: RDF implementation reports Andrew Newman
• Re: Why does OWL have an XML presentation syntax? Jonathan Borden
• Re: question about rdf:parseType="Collection" Jonathan Borden
• Re: labeling implications James Michael DuPont
• Re: labeling implications Charles McCathieNevile
• labeling implications James Michael DuPont
• question about rdf:parseType="Collection" 陳長念
• Microtheories: genlMt vs. genls Richard H. McCullough
• Why does OWL have an XML presentation syntax? Matt Halstead
• Re: answering airport & chicken questions with MKE + OpenCyc Richard H. McCullough

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

• new TAG issue: rdfURIMeaning-39 Dan Brickley
• WWW2004 CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Web Services WSI2004-CFP Call for Papers Savitri Bevinakoppa
• Re: XMLSchema namespace confusion Frank Manola
• Qname and Vname Richard H. McCullough

Tuesday, 2 September 2003

• XMLSchema namespace confusion Garret Wilson
• Re: W3C mailing list search results in RDF Dan Brickley
• [TeamETHOS] Meeting stephcherrygp
• Dublin Core in OWL Raphael Volz
• Re: RDF/Dublin Core documents available? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Using RDF in XML documents Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: RDF validator error Eric Prud'hommeaux
• standalone interface to TAP KB and OpenCyc KB Richard H. McCullough

Monday, 1 September 2003

• Serious problems with Cyc knowledge structure Richard H. McCullough
• hdo walks the hierarchy Richard H. McCullough
• Re: RDF validator error Frank Manola
• Using RDF in XML documents Morcom, Harvey
• Re: Possible RDF Validator options change Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF validator error Jeremy Carroll
• improved "standalone" interface to TAP KB Richard H. McCullough

Sunday, 31 August 2003

• Mobile content Graham Klyne

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 12:11:58 UTC