- From: Hammond, Tony (ELSLON) <T.Hammond@elsevier.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:45:29 +0100
- To: 'Brian McBride' <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi Brian: > I'd suggest that RDF schemas are useful, but not mandatory, so the lack > of one for PRISM does not render it unsuitable for reference in the primer. I take your point - I guess I was just thinking about best practice and the signals being sent out (especially by flagging it as an example application in the Primer). I might have been confusing RDF with the Semantic Web. ;) My concern was really that by making use of a term set without a schema we then appear to have lost machine processability and hence automation. Cheers, Tony
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 06:50:37 UTC