- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 11:59:27 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Message-Id: <p05200f30bba892886718@[129.2.177.32]>
Apologies for not including these in my earlier messages - I hit send sooner than I intended. -Jim H. The info on the OWL langauge and our tests are at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ the specific tests are noted in the test document which is http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/ and the current state of various implementations and how they've done (and how to add one's own) are at http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/test-results-out My earlier mail (separately sent to www-rdf-logic, www-rdf-interest, and public-webont-comments) read: >To all OWL implementors, computational logicians, RDF hackers and >others who may be interested: > > The Web Ontology Working Group (WOWG) call for implementations is >going quite well - in fact, only two of our approved tests currently >remain "unconquered" - these are > >miscellaneous-001 >miscellaneous-002 > >This message is a request to all implementors to ask you to >prioritize these two tests and work towards their solution. > >To make this more fun, I hereby offer the first group that passes >each of these tests the coveted OWL.OWL award -- the WOWG chairs' >award for service "above and beyond the call of duty" in helping OWL >to advance to eventual recommendation status. > -Jim Hendler >
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:01:05 UTC