- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:05:47 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Le mercredi, 1 oct 2003, à 12:26 America/Montreal, Hammond, Tony (ELSLON) a écrit : > The same thing with URI dereferenceability: URIs do not have to be > dereferenceable: Get over it! Quite true... But if there's a possibility of deferenceability of URLs in URI. Some people will do. As you I don't get the necessity of info: scheme, specifically if you compare it to urn: My problem with deferenceable URIs in the semantic Web is that it could cause harm to the whole semantic Web in some circumstances. I would rather prefer they are not deferenceable alltogether and at all. <URI> is a label, reference, etc... (choose a name) which is generic for the use and the context of your work or community. The problem is that you have some URIs like http URLs which are deferenceable, and gives the possibility to have something at the end of it. http://[domain name]/whatever/path/ the domain name can be bought by another party, the domain name is owned by someone, etc. Why it's a problem? Practices: Some people might find useful to put something at the end, for example we can imagine that the Web community decides to put documents (in RDF) that will make sense at the end of this URL. If the practice spread, it can be misussed and/or abused. Someone using an ontology will have suddenly a software that will not work because the expected thing at the end has changed, even if the practice is not in the spec. (I remind that tables in HTML were not created for layout, but it has been the case). So even in the spec, if you say that URIs MUST not be deferenceable, some people will do. I would rather prefer a system, where URIs for semantic Web are not tied to a deferenceable object. A kind of example is for "words" in natural language (Semantic Web URI), they are not owned by people, so they are not dependent in their use from someone (except when using TM brands as common names) BUT you can find definition of these words in multiple dictionaries (Ontologies) private, commercial or public. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 09:05:51 UTC