- From: <ssarkar@ayushnet.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 11:54:36 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Cc: danbri@w3.org
I am very much interested in a global data model on top of web services infrastructure. Currently, the need for a global data model persists and it should be addressed. Layered meta data, service chains and schema driven semantic approach to web services should be considered for standardization. I am interested in such an interest group. --ssarkar@ayushnet.com On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, MDaconta@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 3/13/2003 12:22:49 PM US Mountain Standard Time, danbri@w3.org writes: I'd be interested to hear views from RDF Interest Group members on this proposal. It connects also to our own need to start thinking about the future of the RDF IG over the coming years, and about priorities for future work within W3C. Do people here see "SW Services" as the next big thing? IMO, semantic web services are critical in areas like Web service discovery and orchestration. Additionally, I believe web services in general are a catalyst to other semantic web activities as they increase organizational awareness of open, layered metadata and the potential for semantic interoperability (as opposed to syntactic interoperability). It is that potential that makes the next step from web services to semantic web services both obvious and desirable. So, in essence, Semantic Web services may well be the watershed event to the larger vision of the semantic web. As a blue skies research area? As ripe for standardisation? If there were an Interest Group, or Working Group, or 'taskforce' or mailing list devoted to this topic, would you be interested in participation? I would definitely be interested in participation. Best wishes, - Mike ------------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Chief Scientist, Advanced Programs Group McDonald Bradley, Inc. www.daconta.net
Received on Monday, 17 March 2003 14:56:38 UTC