- From: Roger L. Costello <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:27:26 -0400
- To: danny666@virgilio.it
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Hi Danny,
Danny Ayers wrote:
>
> An application could easily do just that - it's only simple arithmetic
> after all. Consider the application a service, orthogonal to the
> logic. The difficult part is expressing the information in an
> well as the input data you have unambiguous fashion that could be
> shared amongst the applications. As here, presumably you would need a
> way of expressing the result returned from a SWS, A isInside B or
> whatever - thanks RDF/XML.
Thus far in what you've described there is no use of RDFS- or
OWL-ontologies.
> To reason with this you'd presumably need
> to be able to state things like {X isInside A} disJointFrom
> {Y isInside A} - thanks OWL.
I am sorry, I'm not following this. What information is being utilized
from OWL? How is "disjointFrom" being utilized? Could you elaborate
please? /Roger
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 10:27:41 UTC