- From: Jörg-Ulrich Wölfel <woelfel@glueware.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:34:36 +0200
- To: <danny666@virgilio.it>, "Tom Reilly" <treilly@macromedia.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
The "binary" kind of properties you have in mind is defined in OWL as owl:FunctionalProperty a subclass of rdf:Property. Cheers Jörg -----Original Message----- From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Danny Ayers Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:01 PM To: Tom Reilly; www-rdf-interest@w3.org Subject: RE: RDF's binary nature > I realize that, by "binary" I was referring to this: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/#ex-NonBinary "The RDF data model intrinsically only supports binary relations; that is, a statement specifies a relation between two resources." Ok, fair enough - the relations are binary. I'm sure you'd noticed, but just for the record, the later documents at http://www.w3.org/RDF/ have pretty much superceded the 1999 spec even though they're not yet at Recommendation stage. Cheers, Danny.
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 03:41:20 UTC