- From: Jimmy Cerra <jimbobbs@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 17:35:26 -0400
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "'Sean B. Palmer'" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: <jimbobbs@hotmail.com>, <tbray@textuality.com>
I like your ideas. It has been suggested [1] that there are too many RDF syntaxes in the wild; I disagree. These days it seems that everyone, and their mother, has some thoughts on what a RDF serialization should look like, and that's not a bad thing! I say, the more experimentation, then the more likely some good variants will be created. On abbreviating element names for URIs, there has been controversy [2]. Indeed, it seems that a variant of BSWL [3] and XENT is similar to a hypothetical example brainstormed by McCullough and me [4]. One problem with this approach is that it breaks the "qname = element's type" philosophy of XML [5]; I can see that influence in RDF/XML, where element qnames indicate what the node is cast as. However, I don't particularly like using non-xml tokens in a serialization meant for use in XML [6]. I don't want to build a tokenizer for parsing apostrophes, white spaces, and other strings on top of another tokenizer, the XML processor. Furthermore, the escaping sequences for the tokens have to be added - and they can't be entities, since they always gets processed first with the rest of the XML (otherwise, what's the point of using XML). IMHO, using two or more different escaping methods really mucks up the language. Finally I reiterate. I like your ideas; I may have to steal them. ;-) -- Jimmy Cerra ] "I had to learn very early not to limit ] myself due to others limited imagination." ] - Dr. Mae C. Jemison CC: Tim Bray - as with the origional message - to be on the safe side. Although, I don't think he even cares to receive a copy of _this_ email; my apologies in advance if you don't want it. [1] The issue was referred to at the URI: http://dubinko.info/blog/2003_04_13_archive.html#92807249 [2] I.E.: http://internetalchemy.org/2003/05/rdfSyntaxRetrospective.html [3] http://infomesh.net/2001/07/bswl/#Abbreviati [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2003May/0049.html [5] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/04/09/SemanticMarkup [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2003Jun/0030.html
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2003 17:35:36 UTC