- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:40:21 -0700
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I am sure this is spec'd at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#parseTypeCollectionPropertyElt, but I am having trouble understanding how to store an empty collection. Which of the below three n-triples examples is correct? Or if none, what would be correct for what I'm trying to do here? Thanks! Joshua I am assuming something like: http://www.foo.com/subject http://some.org/contributors _:genid1 . _:genid1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#List . _:genid1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil . The above is really what I want, but I could understand if there were some other convention. For example, the following would be understandable: http://www.foo.com/subject http://some.org/contributors _:genid1 . _:genid1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#List . _:genid1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil . _:genid1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#last http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil . And so would (although annoying): http://www.foo.com/subject http://some.org/contributors http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil .
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2003 02:40:40 UTC