- From: <MDaconta@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 16:32:50 EDT
- To: costello@mitre.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Message-ID: <1ce.b46c0e2.2c125472@aol.com>
In a message dated 6/6/2003 12:47:14 PM US Mountain Standard Time, costello@mitre.org writes: > 2. Separate everything: > > - separate data from presentation > - separate data from applications that process the data > - separate semantic definitions from application code > - separate hyperlink definitions from data (put hyperlink > definitions in a linkbase) > 1 and 2 are inexpensive and intuitive. Well supported via tools. #3 is currently expensive until the community reduces the cost via widespread ontology development. Thus, at the present time #3 needs to be caveated based on the complexity, mission criticality and purpose of the application. For #4, I would like to see an example to determine if I agree. Are you stating that a "resource card" (possibly a chunk of RDF) should accompany and be stored separately from every resource (like a card in a card catalog)? Interesting post, - Mike --------------------------------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Chief Scientist, APG, McDonald Bradley, Inc. www.daconta.net
Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 16:40:09 UTC