- From: Miguel Branco <miguel.branco@cern.ch>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:06:32 +0200
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hello, First of all, a short disclaimer: I'm still on a (early) process of learning RDF and N3. :) Still, if I may I'd like to hear your opinion on the following: Given the following (excerpt) N3: { :who1 :father [ :brother :who2 ] } log:implies { :who1 :uncle :who2 }. Given the following N3 facts for the previous rule: :Joe has :father :Fred. :Fred has :brother :Bob. We can then "query" (filter) this with the following (I want to know from whom is Bob the uncle?): { :x :uncle :Bob } log:implies { :x :uncle :Bob }. So, in N3 we can express rules, facts and also filter them. All this using (always) Notation3... Is the above possible using RDF *only*? From what I understand, I can express the rules and the facts in RDF. I cannot filter it using RDF right? I'd have to use something else - Squish, rdfdb? And when those other RDF queries return results (using rdfdb for instance), I'm loosing my RDF syntax. In the case of an rdfdb query, my result could be something like: "?x = Joe". Maybe I'm definitely missing something here but it seems to me that N3 can be more useful than RDF (.. I think ..)... I have this project I'm working on where it would be very useful to have a "standard"/consistent way of expressing and querying information. I was thinking of using RDF to publish all info but it seems that there's no consistent way of querying it... So I was thinking of using N3 instead (because this allows us to filter information besides being also extremely simple to add new facts) - kind of like using N3 on top of HTTP... I could add N3 facts to an existing list of facts with a HTTP PUT, do a N3 filter with a POST (passing the filter in the body), get the whole N3 from a given network node with a GET, delete with a DELETE... Therefore, using always the same language (N3) I could do all that I want regarding publishing and querying of information.. It seems very flexible.. Does this make any sense at all or should I go back to the "drawing board"? Sorry for thinking out loud, Miguel Branco -- _______________________________________________________________ Miguel Branco, CERN, European Organization for Nuclear Research ATLAS Computing Group Building 40-3-D06, Mailbox E25310, CH-1211 Geneva 23 Phone: +41 22 76 71182, +41 22 76 71180 http://msbranco.net
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2003 10:09:09 UTC